It’s Okay to Be Angry: Now What Will You DO With It?

I’ve been a little angry the last few days.  Actually, that’s not fully true.  I’ve been a lot of angry at some points.  As I’ve talked about before, there are people who push my buttons, and there are happenings that create what, I think, is very justified feelings of anger.  But, I’m not particularly good at feeling ok about anger.  I didn’t really learn how to handle anger constructively in my youth.  I don’t come from a family culture where there was calm and easy expression of anger, and the midwest isn’t exactly known for being a great place to be really open about your feelings.  So, when I’m angry, I feel really bad and guilty on top of the anger.  That’s useful, huh?

12 Angry Men are Angry!

Anyhoo, last night and today, I’ve been trying to remind myself that feeling anger isn’t bad in and of itself.  It is a natural emotional response, as normal as fear, happiness, sadness, or excitement.   The important thing is what we do with the anger.  Do we experience it, attempt to understand it, deal with whatever has created it, and move on?  Do we hold on to it and let it simmer and roil around inside?  Do we lash out at others, spreading negativity?

It seems to me that we don’t always have a choice about the experience of an angry emotional feeling, but we do have a choice about how we respond to that feeling.  Responding with calm and compassion and an intent to let go of the anger is far more likely to be productive for everyone involved.  The Buddha once said “Holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned.”  I believe this to be true, in both psychological and physical ways.  Anger not only creates mental stress, but studies have shown that it is bad for our physical bodies.

Letting go of an angry emotion isn’t always easy.  The Dalai Lama suggests the following process:

If you are able to recognize the moment when anger arises, you will be able to distinguish the part of your mind that is feeling anger. This will divide your mind in two parts-one part will be feeling anger while the other will be trying to observe. Therefore anger cannot dominate the entire mind. You are able to recognize that anger is harmful and maybe develop an antidote to it. View your anger objectively. Try to see the positive side of the anger-causing person or event.

That last part seems key.  It’s so easy to focus on what is hard or bad about something that causes us anger.  Finding the positive is difficult, but it’s there.  So, today, I’ll be pondering the wonderful things about the people that have been connected with the feelings of anger I’m having.  I’ll be considering how the pain of arthritis has lead me to yoga and that’s wonderful.  I will be accepting my experience of angry feelings, not chastising myself for having them, and then trying to move on in a positive way.

How about you?

L


Review and Giveaway – First There is a Mountain

As part of a book club for my “home” yoga studio, I recently read First There is a Mountain: A Yoga Romance by Elizabeth Kadetsky. In the post below, I expand upon the response to the book that I presented as part of the book club discussion, and ponder the reasons for some of my own reactions.

The book, theoretically a memoir of the author’s yoga experience discusses the life events that brought her to yoga, and then primarily focuses upon the time she spent learning with legendary yoga guru B.K.S. Iyengar.  The novel reads like a combination of personal journal and historical account of yoga lineage.  The “romance” mentioned in the title is not a romance in the boy-meets-girl sense, but (I suppose) her romance with yoga.

As I read this book, I found myself frequently conflicted about it.  On one hand, I basically enjoyed the read and at times I thought the writing was compelling. At other times, I found it confusing or felt like the organization made it difficult to follow. The time-line in the book jumped forward and back in a non-linear fashion, which is not particularly problematic for me in most cases, but here I found it a challenge due to the writing.  Time was also handled inconsistently, with long periods skipped so completely that I didn’t have a good sense of how old the author was in each segment, or what she had experienced in between the events discussed.   Because so much of the book is about her evolution as a yoga practitioner, being able to understand how long she had practiced, and in what way, at various points of the book was rather crucial to understanding the work.  I had similarly mixed feelings about the issues discussed.

Much of the book was about B.K.S. Iyengar, and his relationship with his students – including the author.  His role as guru is addressed in some detail, with descriptions of students prostrating themselves at his feet, following his commands (and those of his family who taught in the institute) without question, and continuing their studies with him for years.  In U.S. culture, I don’t think we are as likely to accept a guru in the way discussed here. We are too individualistic.  I think that probably informs my reading of the book.  I felt uncomfortable with some of the characterizations of relationships between Iyengar (and his family) and the students. I can’t really imagine finding that sort of treatment acceptable in a student/teacher relationship, but then again we live in a culture that tends to prioritize the power and rights of the student over those of the teacher in many ways.  Because so much else about the author’s psyche here, I wondered that she didn’t do more to explore and unpack her own acceptance of the relationships.

The same contradictory response was there for me in regard to her discussion of eating disorder (or anorexia), which appeared briefly in her discussion of college experience, and was referred back to infrequently through the remainder of the book. While I appreciated her willingness to engage the topic, I feel like the presentation of it (because so much time was compressed between her college years and her trip to India), made it read as if that experience was a short blip on the radar that was easily overcome as soon as she realized what she was doing to herself. That, to me, does a disservice to the women who struggle for years, or their whole lifetime, with eating disorder – even knowing that the behavior isn’t healthy or isn’t what they want to be.  There was also a little bit of glorification of the state of starvation in her discussion of how it made her feel.  I certainly get what she means there, but there wasn’t enough working through it to re-problemetize those feelings.  Overall, I wasn’t sure what  the discussion of her eating disordered period was adding to our understanding of here experience, and that – in combination with the brevity of the discussion of recovery – made it seem a little gratuitous to me.

A final issue that I wish had been worked through a little bit more related to the male/female relationships in the text.  The relationships in India overall, and at the institute specifically, were definitely presented as male-dominated and female dismissive.  The misogyny issue was another thing that the author sort of did a hit and run on. With as much personal reflection as she did, there was virtually no reflection on the connection between the position of women (in either culture) and the relationships she saw and experienced, her eating issues and the eating issues of others, the breakdown experienced by her peer student, her own responses to the relationships she saw, etc.

Basically, I am left unsure how I feel about the book and whether I got anything out of it (or even whether she did) beyond an interesting tale of Iyengar training.  It’s not that I think a book has to be about everything, but it seemed like she wasn’t sure what it was about, so it would touch on something and then scamper away from it without really developing her point.  When the book was over, I found that I could not succinctly say what it was “about” or the main point that it made, and to me that is problematic writing.

So, overall, it’s not a book I would recommend you go out and buy for a lot of money (particularly since it’s out of print and a little hard to find).  But, if you can pick up a used copy cheap (amazon has them) or someone gives you one, it’s worth a read.  In fact, I have a copy you can have!  If you would like my copy of the book – please note, I bought it used, so there are markings in the margins and some underlining – let me know in your comment below and I’ll select a “winner” next Sunday and ship it out!

Namaste,

L

Family – An Exercise in Acceptance, and Love

This is not my family 🙂 I didn't want to put up a picture of all the kids without parental permission. But, this looks like a nice family from 1911.

I am heading home tonight from a week spent in Indiana with my family.  In this case, family means 5 of my children (ages 11 – 20) and 15 or so siblings, parents, nieces and nephews.  It was a wonderful week and an interesting one to be sure.  When my Indiana family and I get together, I can’t help but be struck by the variety of people in the group.  We had family members under 3 to (ahem) over 65 talking and playing games.  There were vegans, vegetarians, omnivores, carnivores, and pickyvores.  The group included Catholics, Episcopals, Presbyterians, agnostics, and at least one Buddhist.  There were some with very liberal political views, some very conservative, and some in between.  There was at least one serious pacifist and one gun-toting proponent of the right to bear arms.  There were runners, walkers, yogis, bicyclers, iron pumpers, and sit-on-the-porchers.

You would think that this amount of difference might result in a lot of bickering or anger, but it didn’t.  Sure, there was the usual sibling fussing, spousal differences of opinion, periodic sighs or eye-rolling, and little disagreements here or there, but they were minimal and they passed quickly due to the overall attitude of acceptance in the group.  Even in the areas where the range of beliefs is broadest, people listened (mostly) patiently and showed much respect for each other’s viewpoints.  This was very clear to me so often across the week and it made me smile, inside and out, to see how far acceptance and loving kindness can go toward creating a beautiful environment.

As I (probably the most liberal person in the group), sat with my father (probably the most conservative) talking politics over coffee for several hours across the mornings, I could see this in action.  As a group of 17 people sat around a kitchen table creating gang names for everyone and working up a script for a future sit-com (it’s a long story) and laughing until we hurt, I could see it.  As I watched an almost 21-year-old young man play almost endless games with his 6 year old female cousin, there it was.  When I heard many omnivore members of the family being solicitous and concerned about the care and feeding of the three vegans in attendance, I saw it.

I can’t say we always get along as well as we did this week.  We have the usual family issues.  But, I think it is the general willingness to accept each other for who we are that makes it all work in the end.  I know my family isn’t unusual in this.  Wouldn’t it be amazing if we could take this loving acceptance that we show for those closest to us and spread it more broadly?  What would that world be like?

Namaste,

L